Group Discussion (4.8.25 & 8.8.25)
The Economics Association of PCM SD College for Women, Jalandhar successfully organised two debate competitions in Room No. 13 at 9:40 a.m., witnessing enthusiastic participation and active intellectual engagement from the students. The events aimed to encourage critical thinking, improve argumentation skills, and create awareness about important socio-economic issues.
Glimpses of the activity:
The first debate was conducted on the topic “Retirement Age Should Be Extended or Not.” Two teams, Team A and Team B, presented their views with confidence and clarity.
Team A, consisting of Kasak, Anshika, and Savita, spoke in favour of extending the retirement age. They highlighted increased life expectancy, the growing need for experienced professionals, and the financial benefits of longer employment. They emphasized that many individuals remain mentally and physically fit beyond the conventional retirement age and that their valuable expertise should not be wasted.
Team B, represented by Pallavi, Harman, and Rulli, argued against the extension of the retirement age. They raised concerns about limited job opportunities for the younger generation, a possible decline in productivity with age, and the importance of enjoying post-retirement life. They strongly advocated for creating space for fresh talent in the workforce. The debate was engaging, with well-reasoned rebuttals and counterpoints. The audience appreciated the clarity, delivery, and depth of research shown by the participants.
The second debate competition was held on the topic “Inheritance – Is it Good or Bad for the Economy?” Two teams participated and presented strong arguments and counterarguments.
Team A spoke in favour of inheritance, stating that it provides financial security to families, supports business continuity, and allows for long-term investments. They argued that inherited wealth creates stability, encourages entrepreneurship, and helps maintain family-owned enterprises, which contribute significantly to economic growth.
Team B argued against inheritance, pointing out that excessive transfer of wealth from one generation to the next leads to economic inequality. They emphasized that inherited wealth often reduces motivation to work hard, concentrates resources in a few hands, and limits opportunities for individuals from less privileged backgrounds. They further stated that reducing inheritance could promote merit-based success and enhance overall productivity in the economy. The debate was intense and thought-provoking, offering the audience a balanced understanding of the issue.
Both sessions proved to be highly informative and intellectually stimulating. The faculty members of the department cherished the hard work of the students and encouraged them to participate in more such academic activities in the future.